Relatives' Distress Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.